Introduction

Herbert Spencer offers its students an outstanding educational experience. A broad, fully supportive group of teachers, specialists, support staff, administrators, individual parents and the parent advisory committee ensure that students are given a rich variety of knowledge, experience and opportunity that supports and encourages them towards excellence in everything that they do.

The school has established a School Mission Statement that states that "The staff at Herbert Spencer will provide a positive educational experience for students. We expect that students will acquire the attitudes, skills and knowledge they require to become successful and contributing citizens. We hope that through our goals we will further develop student's capacities and successes in the areas of literacy, numeracy and social responsibility."

To guide student behavior and interaction, the school has also established a Code of Conduct based on Respect, Responsibility and Relationships. Students are encouraged to conduct themselves in a polite and responsible manner in class, on school property and in all school related activities away from the school to develop considerate and sensitive students who are aware of others’ thoughts, feelings and backgrounds. It is important that all of the community contribute to a positive school environment.

 

Overview of the School Improvement Plan

Like all schools in British Columbia, Herbert Spencer is required to develop an annual School Improvement Plan (SIP) to both establish clear goals for the school as well as ensure that these goals are aligned with the District and Provincial objectives. As in past years, the New Westminster School District established three goals for the SIP.

This year’s goals are:

  1. Literacy - focused on reading and writing and first established in 2002
  2. Numeracy - first established in 2003
  3. Social Responsibility - established in 2007

This plan describer’s an approach that fosters an environment where administration, teachers and parents can continuously improve the students’ opportunity for learning and development throughout the grades, helping them strive towards excellence. To do this, this plan has established a number of integrated steps:

GOAL #1: LITERACY

Literacy Goal: To strive towards improvement and excellence in students’ reading and writing

Literacy Data:

Provincial Foundation Skills Assessment (FSA) testing of Grade 4 students currently provide the only method of measuring and comparing student performance between our school and other schools in the province. This past year (2007-2008), the testing methodology was changed, with the result that the comparison of this year’s test results to previous years would not be valid. However, it is still possible to make relative comparisons between the test results of our school and the district and province for all years.

Herbert Spencer Grade 4 students have consistently performed well in both FSA literacy test categories: Reading and Writing. Between 2004-05 and 2006-07, there has been a slight decline in Reading results. These results are shown in the following graph.

 

 

FSA results since 2002 show that we have continuously performed well when compared to the province, with the following graph showing the trend by which we have exceeded the provincial average. This graph shows that although our school continues to consistently out-perform the provincial average, there has been a noticeable decline over the past few years.

 

 

For this year’s Plan, the School Planning Council identified School-Wide Read and Write data as an important supplement to FSA results. Although the district has been compiling this information for several years, currently there is not a comprehensive electronic database that allows easy trend analysis.

Spencer’s School-Wide Read and Write data is shown in the following tables:

Boys – School Wide Read (%) - Current Year in Bold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Birth Year

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gr. 1

 

 

 

 

100

94

91

97

Gr. 2

 

 

 

94

100

100

100

 

Gr. 3

 

 

89

100

90

100

 

Gr. 4

 

92

92

97

97

 

Gr. 5

95

100

97

93

 

Girls – School Wide Read (%) - Current Year in Bold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Birth Year

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gr. 1

 

 

 

 

100

96

97

96

Gr. 2

 

 

 

96

100

100

100

 

Gr. 3

 

 

97

96

96

100

 

Gr. 4

 

100

100

100

96

 

Gr. 5

100

97

92

100

 

 

 

Boys – School Wide Write (%) - Current Year in Bold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Birth Year

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gr. 1

 

 

 

 

100

100

96

89

88

Gr. 2

 

 

 

100

100

100

100

97

 

Gr. 3

 

 

97

97

100

90

100

 

Gr. 4

 

97

100

94

100

100

 

Gr. 5

97

97

100

94

100

 

Girls – School Wide Write (%) - Current Year in Bold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Birth Year

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gr. 1

 

 

 

 

100

100

100

100

100

Gr. 2

 

 

 

95

100

100

100

100

 

Gr. 3

 

 

100

97

97

100

100

 

Gr. 4

 

100

100

100

97

96

 

Gr. 5

96

100

100

92

100

 

 

Literacy Challenges:

Classroom Analysis in READING indicates challenges in the following areas (Italics indicate steps taken to address these challenges):

Kindergarten: letter identification and corresponding sounds, comprehension

Grade 1: sound & symbol relationships, imagery, fluency, summarizing, and phonemics, frequently used words (identifying and writing)

Grade 2: generating deeper questions, setting reading goals, imagery, strengthening fluency & effective phrasing

Grade 3: extracting evidence from the story, organizing ideas prior to responding, connecting at a deeper level

Grades 4 and 5: generating questions, reading between the lines (infer), using a personal voice/connection, high inference task, prediction and connection at a deeper level, use of nonfiction text, evidence for justification

Classroom Summary Analysis for WRITING indicates challenges in the following (Italics indicate steps taken to address these challenges):

Kindergarten: taking the risk to write ideas, invented spelling, adding supporting details to pictures

Grade 1: meaning personal, originality, conventions (punctuation), understanding of sentence

Grade 2: developing one central idea/focus, using descriptive language and detail, use of connecting words, rereading and editing, conventions (punctuation and capitals)

Grade 3: conventions (punctuation, sentence structure and variety), organization of ideas

Grade 4: conventions (sentence structure and variety, capitals, punctuation), editing, sequence—flow of ideas, topic sentence and development, developing endings/concluding statements, expanding use detail and descriptive words

Grade 5: editing (modifying for meaning or reflection), endings/concluding statements, conventions (sentence construction), development of important ideas, voice, expanding use of detail and descriptive language

 

Literacy Strategies

School based assessments are passed forward each year to allow teachers the opportunity to analyze and target the specific skills which need to be strengthened for each child and for groups of children. Instruction is developed to address areas of concern. School based assessments are also used by the resource team to determine the need in classes and for individual students. The following information highlights areas of concern by grade and strategies used to address these concerns.

READING

WRITING

Literacy Structures:

READING

WRITING

Literacy Conclusions:

  1. Although it has not been determined if the FSA Result trends are statistically significant, observed trends include:
  1. The following conclusions have been drawn from the School-Wide Write data:

Literacy Recommendations:

  1. Results and downward trends in the FSA data indicate that a closer investigation is required to better understand the apparent declining performance in Reading and Writing.
  2.  

  3. An improved district School-wide Write and Read electronic database is recommended to better incorporate the results of this data for examining trends. Further analysis is also recommended to understand the differences with FSA Writing results and why there has been a decline for Grade 1 boys.
  4.  

  5. Although cohort data is transmitted and discussed at school-based team meetings and among teachers through grade group meetings, it is recommended that it be further consolidated in order to continue to help teachers and administrators plan and allocate resources (programs, teachers) for current and future years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GOAL #2: NUMERACY

Numeracy Goal: To continue to support high achievement and excellence in students’ numeracy skills.

Numeracy Data:

Provincial Foundation Skills Assessment (FSA) testing of Grade 4 students currently provide the only method of measuring and comparing student performance between our school and other schools in the province. This past year (2007-2008), the testing methodology was changed, with the result that the comparison of this year’s test results to previous years would not be valid. However, it is still possible to make relative comparisons between the test results of our school and the district and province for all years.

Teachers use their observations of students’ in-class work and their class assessments to understand students’ skills and needs for instruction in mathematics. The implementation of Math Makes Sense, is complemented by our children’s strong foundation in reading and writing and the ability to question at a higher level. The program broadens the understanding of mathematical concepts. However, there are no common school/district-based assessments in math as there are in reading and writing. This makes it difficult to assess and compare achievement across time in a valid manner. With the implementation of a District Math Research team and the participation of three of our teachers on this team, we hope to have a common, district-wide assessment tool available in the future. In the interim we have gathered the following information.

Herbert Spencer Grade 4 students have consistently performed well in the FSA numeracy test category. Between 2004-05 and 2006-07, there has been a significant improvement in Numeracy results (95% to 100%). These results are shown in the following graph.

 

 

FSA results since 2002 show that we have continuously performed well when compared to the province, with the following graph showing the trend by which we have exceeded the provincial average. This graph shows that there has been a noticeable improvement over the past few years.

 

 

Numeracy Challenges:

Grade One:

Grade Two:

Grade Three:

Grade Four:

Grade Five:

Numeracy Strategies:

Numeracy Structures:

 

 

 

Numeracy Conclusions:

  1. Although it has not been determined if the FSA Test Result trends are statistically significant, observed trends include:

 

Numeracy Recommendations:

  1. Results and upward trends in the FSA data indicate that a closer investigation would help us to better understand the apparent improving performance in Numeracy.
  2.  

  3. Apart from the FSA assessment, no other School or District-wide numeracy assessment takes place. It is recommended that the School and District contemplate such assessment and include the collection and evaluation of cohort data.

 

 

GOAL #3: SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

 

Social Responsibility Goal : To develop research-based strategies that support improved awareness and achievement in students’ social responsibility skills

Social Responsibility Data:

BC Performance Scale of Socially Responsible behaviour (rubric), Individual Classroom rubrics, BC Ministry Satisfaction Survey

Accomplishments over time:

While socially responsible behaviour is difficult to measure we are proud that on the 2008 Satisfaction Survey 97% of the grade four children who responded felt that they respect people who are different from themselves, 97% feel safe at school, and 95% know how the school expects them to behave.

Social Responsibility Challenges:

The biggest challenge remains the lack of reliable and valid instruments to ‘score’ a child’s socially responsible behaviour—therefore, qualitative data have been used. While it is difficult to determine numerical measures for Social Responsibility, strategies can nevertheless be developed to assist students to learn socially responsible behaviour. In addition, the District Social Responsbility Rubric can assist teachers to talk with parents and students about socially responsible behaviour, and over time can be a measure to track student development in this area.

Social Responsibility Strategies:

Library

 

Administration

School Operations

Kindergarten/Grade One

Grade Two/Grade Three

Grade Four/Grade Five

 

Social Responsibility Structures:

Social responsibility committee plans and provides strategies. We have formalized the school leadership team of teachers who will share the commitment to enhance a socially responsible learning environment for our students. There are presently eight members. Their role will be to assist and support staff through the process of creating their own unique socially responsible learning community and that of the schools as well.

The monthly virtues will be followed and link quite naturally to the school year. Sept: Respect and Responsibility—October: Thankfulness—November: Peace—December: Generosity—January: Honesty—February: Friendship—March: Diversity—April: Caring and Compassion (Earth Day)—May: Community Spirit (May Day)—June: Citizenship (Canada day etc.) September, October, November and December were very successful with classroom initiatives and three assemblies.


Social Responsibility Conclusions:

  1. There are many excellent Social Responsibility programs that are underway at Herbert Spencer. However partially due to the nature of the goal and partially due to its recent implementation, there is little in the way of evaluation tools to determine the effectiveness of the programs.

 

Social Responsibility Recommendations:

  1. Further work should be undertaken to develop methods for evaluating the effectiveness of the Social Responsibility programs that are in place.

 

 

 

 

 

Herbert Spencer School Planning Council 2008

 

 

School Planning Council ________________________ Ross Chilton

School Planning Council ________________________ Don Klimchuk

School Planning Council ________________________ Ron Unger

 

Director of Instruction ________________________ Sandra Pace

 

Principal : ________________________ Tracy Fulton

 

Vice Principal: _________________________ Karen Addie

Date: ________________________